March 12, 2008


On Obama, Ferraro, and race

Filed under: Barack Obama, HRC
By Feddie (Email) @ 7:11 am

The big MSM controversy yesterday was over this comment by Geraldine Ferraro:

If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.

The Obama folks are, as expected, up in arms over the comment, and have demanded that Hillary and Ferraro do the PC-perp walk before the world-wide media and beg for their forgiveness.

Having a monster of your own making turn on you is always a tragedy, isn’t it?

Anyway, let’s address the merits of Ferraro’s contention, shall we? Would Senator Obama be where he is today were he not black?

Ramesh Ponnuru is inclined to agree with Ferraro, noting:

Ferraro is clearly right as an analytical matter. Some Obama supporters back him because they want to make history–and his race has a lot to do with their belief that he will. It is also the reason he has such strong support from African Americans, without which Clinton would be beating him.

While Ramesh is right in many respects, I don’t think it is fair to Barack Obama to suggest that he is in the position he is today primarily because of his race. In my view, Barack Obama is beating Hillary Clinton because he knows who he is (read: authentic), and is able to communicate his vision for the United States, flawed as it is, in a way that Hillary could never dream of.

I think it is also important to keep the following in mind:

(1) At the beginning of the presidential campaign, Obama only had a slight lead over Clinton with respect to the African-American vote;

(2) Many prominent African-American leaders have questioned Obama’s “blackness” (whatever in the heck that is) throughout this campaign;

(3) The dream of an Obama presidency began in lily-white Iowa;

(4) The dramatic shift in African-American support from Clinton to Obama (from an almost statistical tie to 85%/15% in favor of Obama) is largely attributable to a post-Iowa belief among African-Americans that Obama can actually win and disgust within that community over the Clintons’ race-baiting campaign tactics.

So, while I don’t doubt that Obama had some core African-American support from the very get-go, this support, in and of itself, is not the reason why he is leading Hillary Clinton in the race to be the dem nominee. Obama is beating Hillary, IMHO, because he is an extremely talented politician who has tapped into the psyche of a large segment of the American public (both black and white). And that has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with extraordinary political ability.

(Posted at RedState last night)


Trackback/Pingbacks:

The trackback URL for this post: http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/2294/trackback

  1. Barack Obama News » Blog Archive » Comment on On Obama, Ferraro, and race by Winston Chamberlain
  2. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  3. Barack Obama News » Blog Archive » Comment on On Obama, Ferraro, and race by c matt
  4. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  5. Barack Obama News » Blog Archive » Comment on On Obama, Ferraro, and race by Barack Obama News ยป Blog …
  6. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  7. Barack Obama News » Blog Archive » Comment on On Obama, Ferraro, and race by Jay Anderson
  8. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  9. Wizbang
  10. It's almost Friday!... Day of Reckoning For gun control proponents and opponents a lot is riding on a former security guard for the Supreme Court Annex. Next Tuesday , the Supreme Court will......

  11. Barack Obama News » Blog Archive » Comment on On Obama, Ferraro, and race by Wizbang
  12. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

6 Rebel Yells to “On Obama, Ferraro, and race”

  1. Jay Anderson Says:

    Give Geraldine Ferraro SOME credit …

    … she knows an inexperienced candidate whose place on a national Democrat ticket has less to do with actual accomplishments than it does with superficial factors such as race or gender when she sees one.

    ;-)

  2. In Rem Says:

    It’s something of a pipe dream to think Obama is going to make it all the way through this primary without SOMEONE playing the race card. I salute him for not being the one to do it, though. I can forgive Ferraro for her statements, because, as noted, they aren’t entirely wrong. Perhaps tacky is the better word for it?

    I think you’ve hit on what is going to make Obama so hard to beat in a general election, though. He is sincere (or at least appears to be). Whatever his views are or aren’t (other than CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE!), you are left believing that HE believes them.

    As a longtime Washington guy, McCain is going to struggle against that.

  3. Joe Says:

    Well I suppose if Hillary were a man she might not be where she is either.

  4. c matt Says:

    As in much of politics, a lot of it comes down to image and charm. Substance has long departed the political stage in America.

    For whatever reason, Bill had it;
    W had it too, in a “cowboy” sort of way;
    Obama has plenty of it;

    Hillary - well, the term shrew has met its living persona.

  5. Winston Chamberlain Says:

    Ferraro is absolutely right. Just as the only reason she was selected by Mondale was her sex, a guy with as little relevant, overall experience as Obama would not be considered if he were 100%, rather than 50%, white.

    And has no one considered the irony that America’s “First Black President” will be one who’s half white???

    As Chief Justice Roberts said, “It’s a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.”

  6. Jay Anderson Says:

    I thought America’s “First Black President” was 100% white - William J. Clinton.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress