December 20, 2006


Yet another reason to vote for Brownback

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 2:21 pm

He scares liberals to death.


December 19, 2006


Brownback removes his block on the Neff nomination

Filed under: Brownback, Judicial Nominations
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 10:09 pm

This was the right decision by Brownback. Every judicial nominee deserves an up-or-down vote within a reasonable period of time, and it was inappropriate of Brownback to attempt to condition his vote on Neff agreeing to recuse herself from any gay marriage cases.

I have to say though, I am not at all heartened by what I’ve read about Neff thus far. In a nutshell, she does not strike me as a judicial conservative, and one is only left to wonder why in the world President Bush nominated her in the first place.

Well, the president did nominate Harriet Miers, so I guess that explains the Neff nomination (in part), now doesn’t it?


December 17, 2006


“Brownback’s big backer”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 1:00 pm

Well, it looks as though Senator Brownback just may be able to hang with the big boys when it comes to raising money after all.

(LvJoe)


December 14, 2006


Brownback bleg

Filed under: Brownback
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 1:58 pm

If anyone has the text of the Brownback piece in the latest issue of TNR, I would greatly appreciate you emailing it to me.

Thanks! 


December 10, 2006


“Pro-Life Senator Sam Brownback Says He’ll Win GOP Presidential Primary”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 9:45 am

As I’ve said before, I am not sure whether Senator Brownback can win the GOP nomination, but we’re going to have a good time giving McCain, Giuliani, and Romney the business in the process.


December 8, 2006


Brownback for President

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 3:31 pm

The website is up and running.



Brownback in ‘08

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 3:27 pm

Here’s the latest from the newswire on Senator Brownback’s presidential candidacy:

From the L.A. Times:

“He will add a lot to the national, not just the presidential, debate,” said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, a group represented at those meetings. “He truly understands the conservative point of view. It is so frustrating for us when politicians try to pander to us. Brownback is consistent.”

. . . .

“Culturally and geographically, Sen. Brownback is a tremendous fit for Iowa — the strongest fit of any candidate, Democrat or Republican,” said David Kensinger, his former chief of staff and an informal campaign advisor. “He’s clearly going to run as a Reagan Republican.” (more…)


November 21, 2006


“Conservative Civil War Watch”?

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 7:56 pm

The Theocons are coming! The Theocons are coming! Run for your lives!

Oh, and Andrew, this is not our candidate. This is our man. Get your facts straight.



“Kansas Republican close to deciding on presidential bid”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 9:42 am

Run, Sam, run!


November 11, 2006


“Brownback undeterred by Democrats’ ascent”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 2:58 pm

Good. We certainly need his voice in the 2008 Republican primaries.


October 24, 2006


Feddie and Pelosi/Brownback and Clinton

Filed under: Brownback, Christianity, Politics
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 12:02 pm

It’s often difficult to separate one views about a person from the policy positions that person takes (see my earlier post today re: Nancy Pelosi), especially when those positions are intrinsically evil.  That having been said, we are called as Christians to love our enemies, and that is what I plan to do regarding Nancy Pelosi. I am going to pray for her. I am going to pray that she and other leading dems will see the grave error of supporting the slaughter of millions of innocent children. I am going to try, as best I can, to love Nancy Pelosi. I am going to ask God to change my heart concerning Pelosi, because right now I have nothing but contempt for her; and that’s not a good thing.

You might ask what prompted this post, given that I just published the Pelosi post this morning. Well, it was this post over at Get Religion, which includes the following account of a D.C. Bible study group that includes both Hillary Clinton and Sam Brownback:

One spring Wednesday, a few months into the term, Senator Sam Brownback’s turn came to lead the group, and he rose intending to talk about a recent cancer scare. But as he stood before his colleagues Brownback spotted Clinton, and was overcome with the impulse to change the subject of his testimony. “I came here today prepared to share about this experience in my life that has caused great suffering, the result of which has deepened my faith,” Brownback said, according to someone who watched the scene unfold. “But I’m overcome now with only one thought.” He confessed to having hated Clinton and having said derogatory things about her. Through God, he now recognized his sin. Then he turned to her and asked, “Mrs. Clinton, will you forgive me?” Clinton replied that she would, and that she appreciated the apology.

“It was an extraordinary moment,” the member told me.

This repentance fostered an unlikely relationship that has yielded political bounty. Clinton and Brownback went on to cosponsor one measure protecting refugees fleeing sexual abuse, and another to study the effects on children of violent video games and television shows. “That morning helped make our working relationship,” Brownback told me recently. “It brought me close to someone I did not ever imagine I would become close to.” Since then, Clinton has teamed up on legislation with many members of the prayer group.

I think Senator Brownback’s example is a fine one to follow, especially when one considers where his inspiration to ask for Senator Clinton’s forgiveness came from.


October 18, 2006


“Brownback criticizes business of mail-order brides”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 4:00 pm

LJWorld has this report:

In June, the federal immigration service froze 10,000 visa applications for foreign fiancées because they did not conform with a law that had gone into effect in March. The law, known as the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act, or Imbra, is intended to give foreign women and the U.S. government more information about the men who seek so-called mail-order brides. “This is an unequal partnership where you have somebody dependent on somebody else in a profound way,” said Senator Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, who was a leading sponsor of the law. “It puts women at a significant disadvantage, in a potentially violent situation.”


October 15, 2006


“Brownback won’t back down [on the Neff nomination]”

Filed under: Brownback, Judicial Nominations
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 8:24 am

The Grand Rapids Press has the latest on Senator Sam Brownback’s hold on Judge Janet Neff’s nomination:

“There’s been a five-year fight to get judges appointed from West Michigan and I don’t relish getting into the middle of this,” said Brownback, an opponent of gay marriages and a presidential hopeful. “But I’m pursuing this and trying to get information factually as to what exactly happened, and whether this was a legal or illegal ceremony at the time, and what it reveals about (Neff’s) judicial philosophy.”

Brownback said he received a brief message from Neff on Friday, but it did not provide the answers or explanation he was looking for. Neff has said she cannot comment publicly on the issue while her nomination is pending.

Brownback said the key issue is whether Neff participated in an illegal ceremony.

“If you have someone up for a federal appointment that says, ‘I don’t care, I think this is the right thing to do,’ then this is a violation of the law or an intent by someone who’s to interpret and uphold the law, to violate it,” he said, following the rally. “Now, that may not be the circumstance we have here, but that would clearly be crossing the line to me. Right now, we just don’t know.”


October 9, 2006


To our reader from Iowa

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 9:34 pm

Be sure to take care of Senator Sam Brownback during the Republican Caucus.

Brownback in ‘08!

brownback_line.gif

Oh, and I really love this bumpersticker too. :)

In short, Sam is the man


August 25, 2006


“Mr. Compassionate Conservative”

Filed under: Brownback
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 9:28 pm

The Weekly Standard has a nice profile piece on my main man, Senator Sam Brownback. Here’s a taste:

The senator says he will decide whether to run for president before the elections this fall and then announce his decision soon afterwards. Right now he gets one to two percent in surveys of Republican voters. His candidacy would have to be considered a long shot. But it would satisfy certain threshold tests.

Brownback, who will turn 50 in September, has executive and legislative experience, and is well versed on national security issues. Thoughtful and well respected in both parties, he is politically shrewd and a proven vote getter. Of importance especially to Republican primary voters, he is a committed tax cutter and free trader. He has supported the war on terrorism and championed the cause of human rights and democracy abroad. Outspoken in behalf of the need to appoint judicial conservatives, he was one of the first Republican senators to question the merits of the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers. Few Republican politicians are as close as Brownback is to leading religious conservatives, a key part of the Republican coalition. Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, says of Brownback, “Many have the right voting records, but he has leadership.” It’s not a stretch to think that the Kansas Republican could appeal to conservative voters in the nearby Iowa caucuses, which will kick off the 2008 primary season.

. . . . 

Brownback’s voting record contains almost no surprises. “Yes,” to impeach President Clinton, outlaw partial birth abortion, phase out the estate and gift taxes, authorize permanent trade relations with China, approve the Bush tax cuts, permit oil and gas development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, authorize the use of military force against Iraq, approve the Medicare prescription drug benefit, and confirm John Roberts and Sam Alito. But “No,” to enact McCain-Feingold, the campaign finance law, extend the ban on the sale and possession of assault weapons, and restrict deployment of a national missile defense system.

Brownback has spent much of his time in the Senate on life and family issues. Besides opposing Roe v. Wade, he has sponsored the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, the Prenatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act, and the Human Cloning Prohibition Act . . . . Brownback also has supported the constitutional amendment that would define marriage as between a man and a woman and thus ban “same-sex marriage.”

Brownback probably keeps track of issues of concern to social conservatives more keenly than any other senator. He runs the weekly meetings of the Values Action Team, attended by representatives of 30 to 40 organizations, including the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, Eagle Forum, Christian Coalition, National Right to Life, Prison Fellowship, and the American Center for Law and Justice. Brownback meets with no other group so regularly, nor is it possible to find many causes advanced by social conservatives that he hasn’t supported. Brownback’s deep interest in the social issues agenda was evident when I asked him what his big idea will be if he runs for president: “Mine is going to be to rebuild the culture and the family.”

Along with that, he is an ardent humanitarian. Brownback has concentrated on the difficult situations in Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Uganda, the Congo, Pakistan, Ukraine, China, North Korea, and Vietnam. Arguably no senator has done more to press for human rights and democracy, or to confront the spread of deadly disease, such as malaria, which kills roughly 800,000 children in Africa every year. He has made a habit in this arena of cosponsoring laws with Democrats, teaming up, for example, with Evan Bayh on the Iran Democracy Act, Ted Kennedy on the North Korea Human Rights Act, and the late Paul Wellstone on the Trafficking in Victims Protection Act. According to his close friend and colleague Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Brownback knows that “if you get a few Democrats to work with you, you have a much better chance of getting something done.”


August 21, 2006


Yet another reason why I’ll be supporting Brownback in 2008

Filed under: Brownback, Darfur, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 11:00 pm

He received as A+ from the Genocide Intervention Network for his noble efforts to address the genocide taking place in Darfur. 


August 19, 2006


“Q&A with Sen. Sam Brownback”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 5:00 pm

Courtesy of U.S. News & World Report:

On the future of the GOP:

Much of the change of the party came with Reagan … now you’re seeing the accomplishment of a fair number of those agenda items, and the party is saying, “How do we grow from here? How do we expand the base?” You have to get more plays in the playbook. The expansion of the party takes place in the compassionate conservative agenda area, under the notion that every person at every state of life is a beautiful, unique, sacred child of a living God. (more…)


August 7, 2006


“Brownback Introduces Bill to Fight Assisted Suicide”

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008, Republicans
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 1:29 pm

Yet another reason why I’ll be supporting Senator Brownback in the crowded 2008 GOP presidential primary.


July 19, 2006


Excellent Article on Brownback’s Shot at the Presidency

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Justin (Email) @ 2:13 pm

I, for one, would definitely pull for him to be the VP on Allen’s ticket: ;)

For now, Christian conservative leaders are still looking around. “The current front-runners are on values issues hard to distinguish in many respects from a lot of folks in the other party,” Bauer says. “People keep saying, ‘Who’s the conservative going to be?’ ”

Brownback hopes to become that candidate.

“There are two windows you’ve got to get through” to win the Republican presidential nomination, he says the next morning over pancakes and coffee at Des Moines’ Drake Diner. “One is: Are you ideologically acceptable? Secondly: Are you electable?”

He says he’s answered the first question. He leaves to greet delegates at the state GOP convention, trying to answer the second. One voter at a time.


July 18, 2006


Brownback on embryonic-stem-cell research

Filed under: Brownback, Embryonic Stem Cell Research
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 12:46 pm

Senator Brownback is the man:

Adult and cord blood stem cell research has yielded 72 peer-reviewed treatments for conditions ranging from spinal injuries to leukemia. Embryonic stem cell research, which has not delivered any peer-reviewed treatments or human clinical trials, is immoral and unnecessary because of the much greater promise and track record of adult and cord blood stem cell research. . . . While researchers in the private sector are free to destroy young human lives through embryonic stem cell research, the government should not be in the business of funding this ethically troubling research with taxpayer dollars.


April 29, 2006


In case you were wondering . . .

Filed under: Brownback, Election 2008
By Steve Dillard (Email) @ 10:42 am

John McCain is still not the right man for the job.

Brownback in ‘08

Update: Here’e the video/audio of McCain’s crazy quote.


Powered by WordPress