Kmiec provides the details here.
M.Z. Forrest believes that the chaplain’s denial of communion to Kmiec violates Canon 912.
M.Z. may indeed be right, and I don’t doubt that he knows much more about Canon Law than I do, but I think I’ll wait for Ed Peters’s analysis.
Either way, I am glad the good chaplain gave Kmiec an earful.
Update: If any of SA’s readers know the name of the chaplain or how to get in touch with him, please let me know via email. I would like to offer him an opportunity to give his version of the event in question here at SA.
Update II: Jay has additional details and commentary here.
Update III: Jay has informed me that Ed Peters has come down on the side of Kmiec; and if Peters says the chaplain violated Canon Law then I accept his conclusion without reservation.