<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Southern Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southernappeal.org</link>
	<description>Giving the bayonet to the "dictatorship of relativism" since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MONSTER HUNTING FOR FUN AND PROFIT.</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14304</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14304#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was surfing a gun enthusiast web site looking for some specific handgun info when I came across an intriguing review of Monster Hunter International, a modern fantasy/horror-action novel.  The story is about an accountant, Owen Z. Pitt, who survives an attack by a werewolf that used to be his insufferable boss.  Because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surfing a gun enthusiast web site looking for some specific handgun info when I came across an intriguing review of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Monster-Hunter-International-Larry-Correia/dp/1439132852/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1268271189&amp;sr=1-1">Monster Hunter International</a>, a modern fantasy/horror-action novel.  The story is about an accountant, Owen Z. Pitt, who survives an attack by a werewolf that used to be his insufferable boss.  Because Own not only survived the attack but handled himself well he is recruited into a private company, Monster Hunter International (MHI), that hunts monsters for bounties (think of a sort of monster hunting Blackwater Security).  Almost immediately, Owen finds himself and his fellow hunters battling an ancient evil that threatens to unleash a hellish invasion intended to wipeout humanity.</p>
<p>While I am not generally a fan of fantasy or science fiction, I am a fan of good stories, guns and smart humor.  The author of the book, <a href="http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/">Larry Correia</a>, is a competitive shooter and gun dealer.  Consequently, he demonstrates a solid knowledge of firearms throughout the novel.  However, he never bogs down the story with a Tom Clanyesque  exploration of minute technical details.  </p>
<p>The story is funny, action packed, with characters that are colorful and entertaining.  There is even a conservative/libertarian limited government vibe that runs through the story.  MHI has a shaky relationship with federal regulatory agencies and law enforcement.  In short, whether you like fantasy/scifi or not, Monster Hunter International is a book I can’t recommend highly enough.  I literally could not put the book down and I am absolutely pregnant with anticipation over <a href="http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/mhi-sample/#comment-5848">the sequel</a>.   </p>
<p>Speaking of monsters, check out this great song from Skillet, a Christian rock band. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14304"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14304/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satan in the Vatican?</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14300</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14300#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dead Mule</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catholicism/Catholic Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I would pretty much define the ultimate in bad publicity as a headline on Drudge reading, &#8220;Devil at Work in the Vatican.&#8221;  That&#8217;s certainly going to feed the untiring Vatican conspiracy mongers, of whom there is never a shortage.
The story, based on the comments of the Vatican&#8217;s chief exorcist, is itself unremarkable.  Fr. Amorth points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/devil-saint.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14301" title="devil-saint" src="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/devil-saint-261x300.jpg" alt="" width="261" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>I would pretty much define the ultimate in bad publicity as a<a href="http://www.drudgereport.com"> headline on Drudge</a> reading, &#8220;Devil at Work in the Vatican.&#8221;  That&#8217;s certainly going to feed the untiring Vatican conspiracy mongers, of whom there is never a shortage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article7056689.ece">The story</a>, based on the comments of the Vatican&#8217;s chief exorcist, is itself unremarkable.  Fr. Amorth points to the abuse scandals and heterodoxy, which are certainly a sign of spiritual disorder, but one would have to expect the devil to be at work in the best of times.  He was with Christ in the wilderness, so he will certainly be with the Pope in the Vatican (plus, the food&#8217;s better in Rome).</p>
<p>Btw, I&#8217;m off to the wilds of Pennsylvania for a few days.  See you next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14300/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youth &amp; Manhood &#8211; A Sad Future</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14296</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14296#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Davy Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m  not a big fan of George Will. He possesses too much of the condescending &#8220;inside the  beltway elitism&#8221; attitude that I find disgusting. However he does, on  occasion, knock one out of the park with his commentary. Such is the case  with a recent piece in Newsweek. Here&#8217;s a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m  not a big fan of George Will. He possesses too much of the condescending &#8220;inside the  beltway elitism&#8221; attitude that I find disgusting. However he does, on  occasion, knock one out of the park with his commentary. Such is the case  with a recent piece in Newsweek. Here&#8217;s a few choice quotes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mike  Stivic, a.k.a. Meathead, the liberal graduate student in <em>All in  the Family</em>, reflected society&#8217;s belief in the cultural superiority  of youth, but he was a leading indicator of something else: He lived in  his father-in-law Archie Bunker&#8217;s home. What are today&#8217;s &#8220;basement  boys&#8221; doing down there? Perhaps watching <em>Friends</em> and <em>Seinfeld</em> reruns about a culture of extended youth utterly unlike the world of  young adults in previous generations.</p>
<p><em>And . . .</em></p>
<p>Although Cross, an aging  academic boomer, was a student leftist, he  believes that 1960s radicalism became &#8220;a retreat into childish tantrums&#8221;  symptomatic &#8220;of how permissive parents infantilized the boomer  generation.&#8221; And the boomers&#8217; children? Consider the television  commercials for the restaurant chain called Dave &amp; Buster&#8217;s, which  seems to be, ironically, a Chuck E. Cheese&#8217;s for adults—a place for  young adults, especially men, to drink beer and play electronic games  and exemplify youth not as a stage of life but as a perpetual refuge  from adulthood.</p></blockquote>
<p>As I sometimes try to drive home this point to other young men with whom I&#8217;m attempting to mentor, I&#8217;ll ask them to try this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Picture, in your mind, your ideal representation of the manly hero &#8211; a George Washington, a Robert E. Lee, a George Patton, a Douglas MacArthur &#8211; and then <em>try </em>to picture them sitting in front of the TV in baggy shorts, an earring, a wine cooler watching <em>Friends </em>and reacting to something by saying <em>Dude</em>! What&#8217;s wrong with that picture? Now, ask yourself: How do you want to be thought of?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not all readers will understand my point. I hope most of you over 40 will.</p>
<p>You can read the rest of Will&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/234248">piece here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14296/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood Wants You</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14293</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14293#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Younger Now</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom-feeders at Planned Parenthood are apparently rooting around for &#8220;hard cases&#8221; to illustrate the supposed need for [federally-funded] abortions.
&#8220;Help us tell the real story. Your story. Right now. Congress needs to hear from women who have experienced wanted pregnancies where there was a sever health risk to the fetus, causing the women to choose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom-feeders at Planned Parenthood are apparently <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat6092.html">rooting around</a> for &#8220;hard cases&#8221; to illustrate the supposed need for [federally-funded] abortions.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Help us tell the real story. Your story. Right now. Congress needs to hear from women who have experienced wanted pregnancies where there was a sever health risk to the fetus, causing the women to choose abortion&#8230;. This is just the type of real and compelling story to illustrate how an abortion ban would affect women all over America.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I have 305,310 compelling abortion stories; each is the story of a child <a href="http://liveaction.org/blog/planned-parenthood-abortions-vs-adoption-referrals/">killed by a Planned Parenthood abortion</a> in 2007.</p>
<p>Everyone is aware that people suffer. Planned Parenthood and other pro-aborts are hardly tilling new soil there.  But the idea that alleviating suffering justifies the killing of another is untenable. The case of <em>R v. Dudley and Stephens</em> has some great language for this discussion. The case involved murder charges against survivors of a shipwreck who, after supposedly casting lots, ate the cabin boy who was a fellow castaway in the lifeboat. When reading the case for criminal law, I was struck by the following language, which is an great response to the &#8220;hard cases&#8221; in bioethics (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>It must not be supposed that in refusing to admit temptation to be an excuse for crime it is forgotten how terrible the temptation was; how awful the suffering; how hard in such trials to keep the judgment straight and the conduct pure</em>. </strong>We are often compelled to set up standards we cannot reach ourselves, and to lay down rules which we could not ourselves satisfy. <strong><em>But a man has no right to declare temptation to be an excuse</em></strong>, though he might himself have yielded to it, nor allow compassion for the criminal to change or weaken in any manner the legal definition of the crime.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14293/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Wrongs</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14291</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14291#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quin Hillyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hans von Spakovsky has a great piece at NRO today about how Obama has radicalized the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. Well worth a read.
And that&#8217;s not the only problem at Justice. More, including internal links, here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans von Spakovsky has <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NjQzODdkNjE5Mjc3ODM5MjA1YmM3ZjJmNTAyOGY2OTM">a great piece</a> at NRO today about how Obama has radicalized the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. Well worth a read.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not the only problem at Justice. More, including internal links, <a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/09/wolf-chases-panthers">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14291/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Reconciliation Really Does Not Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14288</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14288#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Hurtado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our own Quin Hillyer makes a great, but overlooked point on reconciliation. The first move in reconciliation is that the House must pass the Senate version of the bill. Civics 101. Once the House has passed the Senate version of the health care bill, both Houses of Congress have passed the same bill. What do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our own <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/05/the-blazing-saddles-of-reconciliation/">Quin Hillyer makes a great, but overlooked point on reconciliation.</a> The first move in reconciliation is that the House must pass the Senate version of the bill. Civics 101. Once the House has passed the Senate version of the health care bill, both Houses of Congress have passed the same bill. What do we have then? A signable bill!!!! So if the efforts to &#8220;fix&#8221; the bill via reconciliation in the Senate fail, it doesn&#8217;t matter. Obama can sign health care reform. That&#8217;s a Chicago two-step if we&#8217;ve ever seen one. So the key to this whole thing is simple: don&#8217;t let the House pass the Senate bill. Period. End of Story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14288/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reconciliation as Pickett&#8217;s Charge?</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14285</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14285#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dead Mule</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Examiner has chosen a rather odd analogy for the Democrat&#8217;s decision to ram health care legislation through in spite of overwhelming public opposition:  Pickett&#8217;s Charge at Gettysburg.
It was Pickett&#8217;s Charge of the Confederates at Gettysburg in 1863, a horrendous, bloody carnage that could have been avoided, had not their commander, Gen. Robert E. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Examiner has chosen a <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obama-calls-Dems-to-Pickett_s-Charge-86252767.html">rather odd analogy</a> for the Democrat&#8217;s decision to ram health care legislation through in spite of overwhelming public opposition:  Pickett&#8217;s Charge at Gettysburg.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It was Pickett&#8217;s Charge of the Confederates at Gettysburg in 1863, a horrendous, bloody carnage that could have been avoided, had not their commander, Gen. Robert E. Lee, been so determined to do it his way &#8212; a massed frontal assault against a nearly impregnable position.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It is to just such a political Pickett&#8217;s Charge that President Obama now summons congressional Democrats on behalf of his health care reform proposal, a last desperate gamble to overcome a sturdy, strengthening line of Republican opposition reinforced beyond measure in recent months by the knowledge they stand with a solid majority of their countrymen. Obama and Democratic brigade commanders Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi know there will be terrible casualties among their troops come November, but still they urge them on, to sacrifice their jobs, careers and political futures for &#8230; 2,700 pages of new bureaucratic rules, mandates, directives and edicts that will surely destroy the finest health care system in the world.</p>
<p>So this would make Obama General Lee?  He&#8217;s gotta love that.  Teddy Kennedy, I suppose, would be the fallen Stonewall Jackson, who might have turned the tide had he not died before the decisive battle.  Harry Reid has the ponderous ego and glacial reactions of Longstreet.  Nancy Pelosi will have to serve as the fashionable, jetsetting Jeb Stuart (unfortunately, she&#8217;s not absent from the scene in the early stages).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get a regiment over to hold Little Round Top, the key to the whole battlefield.  I nominate Paul Ryan for the role of Chamberlain.</p>
<p>This whole Union thing is going to take some getting used to, but there&#8217;s something to be said for it.  Overwhelming numbers, a heady dose of moral superiority, imputed innocence.</p>
<p>How about Billy Yank as the new Ole Miss mascot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14285/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Horrible Judicial Nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14282</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14282#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quin Hillyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Liu of common sense, we get a nominee who believes there is a constitutional right to welfare.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Liu of common sense, we get <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/03/a-constitutional-right-to-welfare/">a nominee</a> who believes there is a constitutional right to welfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14282/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14277</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14277#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that U of M’s search for a new politically correct sideline mascot is not going as planned.  Apparently, Admiral Ackbar leads the polls as the Colonel’s successor of choice.
Poor Ole Miss, They just can’t handle a decision of this magnitude.
Hat tip to Ace of Spades.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that U of M’s search for a new politically correct sideline mascot is not going as planned.  Apparently, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/28/admiral-ackbar-ignites-backlash-at-ole-miss/">Admiral Ackbar leads the polls</a> as the Colonel’s successor of choice.</p>
<p>Poor Ole Miss, They just can’t handle a decision of this magnitude.</p>
<p>Hat tip to <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/298912.php">Ace of Spades</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ackbar.jpg"><img src="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ackbar-210x300.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-14278" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14277/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maker&#8217;s does Calipari</title>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14273</link>
		<comments>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14273#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dead Mule</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southernappeal.org/?p=14273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Well, this is interesting.  Maker&#8217;s Mark has decided to do a limited edition bottle in UK blue featuring the mug of John Calipari. Proceeds will go to benefit a UK music outreach program, which makes sense given that bourbon helps one to endure the average symphony program these days.
I do hope Maker&#8217;s realizes that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/coach-cal.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-14274" title="coach-cal" src="http://www.southernappeal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/coach-cal.jpg" alt="" width="194" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Well, this is interesting.  Maker&#8217;s Mark has decided to do a <a href="http://www.bourbonblog.com/blog/2010/03/01/uk-basketball-coach-john-calipari-on-makers-mark-bottle/">limited edition bottle</a> in UK blue featuring the mug of John Calipari. Proceeds will go to benefit a UK music outreach program, which makes sense given that bourbon helps one to endure the average symphony program these days.</p>
<p>I do hope Maker&#8217;s realizes that they will have to forfeit credit for the sales after Calipari leaves UK on probation.  (I kid, I kid.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14273/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
