<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Southern Appeal</title>
	<link>http://www.southernappeal.org</link>
	<description>Giving the bayonet to the "dictatorship of relativism" since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>ACADEMY AWARD WINNING MOVIE TRAILER</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hat tip to Big Hollywood
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14310</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>REAGAN vs. OBAMA</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Reagan wins.

Hat tip to Theo Spark
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14307</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>MONSTER HUNTING FOR FUN AND PROFIT.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I was surfing a gun enthusiast web site looking for some specific handgun info when I came across an intriguing review of Monster Hunter International, a modern fantasy/horror-action novel.  The story is about an accountant, Owen Z. Pitt, who survives an attack by a werewolf that used to be his insufferable boss.  Because [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14304</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Satan in the Vatican?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
I would pretty much define the ultimate in bad publicity as a headline on Drudge reading, &#8220;Devil at Work in the Vatican.&#8221;  That&#8217;s certainly going to feed the untiring Vatican conspiracy mongers, of whom there is never a shortage.
The story, based on the comments of the Vatican&#8217;s chief exorcist, is itself unremarkable.  Fr. Amorth points [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14300</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Youth &amp; Manhood &#8211; A Sad Future</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m  not a big fan of George Will. He possesses too much of the condescending &#8220;inside the  beltway elitism&#8221; attitude that I find disgusting. However he does, on  occasion, knock one out of the park with his commentary. Such is the case  with a recent piece in Newsweek. Here&#8217;s a few [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14296</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood Wants You</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom-feeders at Planned Parenthood are apparently rooting around for &#8220;hard cases&#8221; to illustrate the supposed need for [federally-funded] abortions.
&#8220;Help us tell the real story. Your story. Right now. Congress needs to hear from women who have experienced wanted pregnancies where there was a sever health risk to the fetus, causing the women to choose [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14293</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Civil Wrongs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Hans von Spakovsky has a great piece at NRO today about how Obama has radicalized the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. Well worth a read.
And that&#8217;s not the only problem at Justice. More, including internal links, here.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14291</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why Reconciliation Really Does Not Matter</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Our own Quin Hillyer makes a great, but overlooked point on reconciliation. The first move in reconciliation is that the House must pass the Senate version of the bill. Civics 101. Once the House has passed the Senate version of the health care bill, both Houses of Congress have passed the same bill. What do [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14288</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reconciliation as Pickett&#8217;s Charge?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Examiner has chosen a rather odd analogy for the Democrat&#8217;s decision to ram health care legislation through in spite of overwhelming public opposition:  Pickett&#8217;s Charge at Gettysburg.
It was Pickett&#8217;s Charge of the Confederates at Gettysburg in 1863, a horrendous, bloody carnage that could have been avoided, had not their commander, Gen. Robert E. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14285</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Horrible Judicial Nominee</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In Liu of common sense, we get a nominee who believes there is a constitutional right to welfare.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.southernappeal.org/index.php/archives/14282</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
